Giỏ hàng (0)
Response: Which prospective data could be interesting, without a doubt, however for our lookup concern. Should your reviewer takes into account our analyses are not appropriate answer our very own lookup matter (to not most other probably fascinating research questions), you want to discover a very clear breakdown of them proposed analyses and you can an excuse in their mind. Since the the fresh new reviewer has not rationalized this point possesses merely revealed just what he/she’d like to see or might have accomplished by himself/herself, is need not do this. The goals in our manuscript are unmistakeable; not especially challenging, however, clear: to compare chathour online users and nonusers when you look at the mating orientations. New advised study is not necessarily the one to necessary to make an effort to bring a way to the browse concern.
Of an analytical views, it has been noted for a lifetime one dichotomizing variables isn’t a beneficial behavior (Cohen, 1983).
The newest SOI-R did report differences when considering men (expected). Yet regarding the demonstrated regression (table 2) the outcomes are unexpected into Penke & Asendorpf (2008, p. 14). How come? How does it look in the entire design?
Response: Once again, i’ve had problems to completely understand the opinion. Hence, we really do not create any changes from this issue.
age.g. 222-229: The latest dialogue in addition to concept was discussing the latest intentions away from profiles. But really zero motives was examined, however, thinking. The web link ranging from both are shed in the blog post, excite render some after that literary works otherwise focus on thinking.
Response: We regret not to getting decided on this aspect. With all this doing disease, i learn whether discover variations in mating orientations (short-identity, long-term) dependent on even when you’re a person of relationship software. All of our strategy try based on prior look did on this subject topic and you may, till the better of our very own training, there’s absolutely no choice means from this dilemma having showed becoming better than today’s that. Hence, we really do not do alterations in the latest manuscript according having to that it remark.
Severe: The fresh new resource away from single college students are lost before (term or perhaps in the first 50 % of the fresh conceptual).
Response: Thanks a lot a whole lot because of it comment. Adopting the their recommendation, i have provided this problem in the first half of the new conceptual (p. dos, range 28): “Players was indeed 902 solitary people away from a middle-size Language school…”. Other than that, on Members and you can Processes area, we said: “This research was section of a much bigger project carried out in an effective Language college or university that lined up to explore multiple regions of the fresh sexuality of more youthful students” (now, from inside the p. 6, contours 142-143). Additionally, we told you “the author?s college” (p. 7, range 170), and therefore concern is pointed out from inside the study’s limits (now, from inside the p. fifteen, lines 336-340).
235: “Conclusions”. Since the correlations is displayed and you can theory tested inside the a combination-sectional research, the newest wording could be picked even more thoughtful.
Response: I’ve meticulously featured it section and we also have not been capable of getting people causal claim. I’ve made an effort to establish the results once the ‘differences’, ‘correlations’ otherwise ‘associations’. However if we overlooked any causal claim, we’ll switch it.
Response: Thanks for the recommendation. We provided much more information about Constraints part, to add all the products mentioned of the writers (today from inside the pp. 15-sixteen, outlines 341-365):
The research has numerous restrictions. Almost every other limits was about the fresh representativeness of your sample and you will new generalization of your own efficiency. Among finally members, the take to are mostly people, aged between 18 and twenty-six, unmarried and you will from just one college, making the overall performance tough to generalize to university students and you can, however less so you’re able to younger low-students.